
Date: 98/09/23 (yr/mo/day)
Student Name: Caitlin
Student No.: nnn-nnn-nnn
Birth Date: 82/08/23 (yr/mo/day)
Grade: Senior Years One
School: Anywhere Collegiate School Division: Any S.D.
Referral Date: 89/04/30 (yr/mo/day)
Case Manager: Classroom Teacher - Mrs. Math
Program Planning Team:
| Name | Position | Signature |
|---|---|---|
| Caitlin C. | Student , (if appropriate ) | |
| Parents | ||
| Teacher | ||
| Teacher | ||
| Resource/SN Teacher |
(Signature indicates you understand the IEP)
Relevant Medical/Diagnostic Information:
January 1984: At the Child Development Clinic, Winnipeg, student was diagnosed with Pervasive Developmental Disorder with profound delays in Visual Perceptual Skills: in the area of Form Constancy, Figure Ground and Visual Spatial Awareness. Student received services from the pre-school autism program, prior to entering grade one.
In 1987 the physiotherapist assessed the student and found that the student had severe Dyspraxia (related to motor planning).
Sept. 1993: Intellectual Assessment by psychologist at the Child Guidance Clinic assessed the student as functioning in borderline range overall on both the
WISC-R and the non-verbal scale of the Kaufman ABC Test. Major impact is in the area of comprehension or processing information and giving meaning to it within auditory and visual stimuli. There is a discrepancy between the ability to decode reading material and the ability to understand what was read. Anxiety level is high in this student, this will have a great impact on peer relationships and attempting learning.
Other Information:
Language Spoken: English
Agencies Involved none at present
School History (from pertinent Cumulative File Information):
Past Schools:Somewhere Elementary K-5
Someplace Middle School 6-8
Prior Resource Involvement:
Student has functioned consistently 6 years behind peers and needs an IEP for visual perceptual, visual motor, motor planning, social/interpersonal and academic delays.
Resource and classroom teachers need to plan an IEP together that includes:
Motor Domain: adaptations and/or modifications for the students severe visual perceptual, visual motor, and motor planning needs.
Academic Domain: significant modifications to department-developed courses with a focus on academics, self-direction, and organizational skills within a functional perspective related to long term goals.
Social Domain: assistance in developing social and interpersonal skills within courses the student is registered in.
Student has access to paraprofessional who works with a group of students with special needs who are integrated into the classroom, and access to the special needs teacher for pullout small group programming related to further skill development and practice.
Current Level of Performance: Comprehensive assessments using a variety of tools indicates that the student has a significant cognitive disability determined through a collaborative team decision making process involving both the home and school. Student has limitations in several areas of adaptive functioning including communication, use of community resources, social/interpersonal, self-direction and needs functional academics.
Motor Domain: The student has severe delays (age equivalency of 1.5 years) in the areas of motor planning, visual motor and visual perceptual skills and effect all areas of learning. Student is currently increasing her computer knowledge within the classroom structure to compensate for severe delays in the above areas.
Social Domain: The student has difficulty with initiating interactions and interacting reciprocally with peers or adults. The student will interact if the peer or adult initiate; however, the information shared is very minimal in detail. The student can be disruptive in a classroom or cooperative grouping if anxious about the activity. The student will display anxiety by laughing uncontrollably, running away, or moving in a preservative manner (arm flapping, picking at things compulsively or running in circles).
Academic Domain: The student can read material at grade 3 level, however, the students current level of understanding material remains at the knowledge/comprehension stage. The student continues to develop literacy strategies to assist in reading materials in a functional manner for a specific purpose (reading to gain information, to complete tasks, to locate and maintain a school job, and for leisure). In the area of Mathematics, the student uses a calculator and works on strands within the grade 3 curriculum. The student can add and subtract using a calculator. The student continues to perseverate on clocks. The student can read and understand the daily schedule and time as it relates to re-occurring events, however applying time principles to daily tasks or problems cause confusion.
Motor Domain:
Student Specific Outcomes:
By the end of June, within the structure of the ELA classroom/and pullout
resource program, Caitlin will produce a weekly computer generated Chart
(which will be used as a daily self -evaluation checklist) independently
with 90% accuracy in 10 consistent trials.
| Performance Objectives | Instructional Strategies | Materials/ Resources |
Roles/ Responsibilities |
Date Started | Date Completed | Evaluation and Review | |
| By the end of November, Caitlin will click in Table
menu on the computer and produce a new 7 column, 2 row weekly chart
with teacher input, 9 out of 10 trials
By the end of February Caitlin will click on Table menu on tool bar and produce a 7 column, 2 row weekly chart using the prompt chart without teacher input with 90% accuracy |
Model for student how tthis is done
Post chart for student to refer to Check with student to see if there are additional prompts the student wants to include Encourage the production of this chart in other subject areas |
Computer Prompt Chart | Student will generate a weekly chart using the classroom
computer
Classroom teacher (C.T.) will ensure student has computer time and access in class Resource teacher (RT) will write out the steps on a chart with the student for developing a 7 column and 2 row chart using the Table menu on the computer |
Classroom and Resource teacher will monitor students
progress on ability to access the Table menu from the tool bar using
observation and a checklist
Student will provide a print copy of generated chart Student will self-evaluate using a rating scale to indicate how much help was needed to complete the table
|
Motor Domain:
Student Specific Outcomes:
By the end of June, within the structure of the ELA classroom/and pullout
resource program, Caitlin will produce a weekly computer generated chart
independently with 90% accuracy in 10 consistent trials.
| Performance Objectives | Instructional Strategies | Materials/ Resources |
Roles/ Responsibilities |
Date Started | Date Completed | Evaluation and Review |
| By the end of June, Caitlin will click on the Table menu on tool bar and produce a 7 column, 2 row weekly chart independently for 9 out of 10 times | Gradually fade the support required by covering chart
Gradually apply chart generating on the computer to other subject areas and of differing sizes |
CT: provide feedback to student and parents on progress related to the performance objective(s) |
Academic Domain:
Student Specific Outcomes:
Caitlin will read to locate information in 2 daily newspapers within the
Senior 1 ELA class with 95% accuracy by June. (ELA SY1: 3.2.5)
| Performance Objectives | Instructional Strategies | Materials/ Resources |
Roles/ Responsibilities |
Date Started | Date Completed | Evaluation and Review |
| At the end of October, Caitlin will independently
locate six pieces of information in one newspaper (The Winnipeg
Free Press) 95% of the time as measured in a checklist
The pieces of information are:
By the end of January, Caitlin will use a highlighter to locate independently the 6 pieces of information listed above in two newspapers (Winnipeg Free Press and the Winnipeg Sun) 95% of the time as measured in a checklist |
Model initially using a matching
Use different colour high lighters or markers/coding to locate each of the pieces of information required to find Fade the support Use peers to listen to the student read the information once it is located |
Copies of the newspapers used: Free Press,
Winnipeg Sun
High lighter, markers or legend with code for locating the information |
Classroom teacher supplies the paper
on a daily basis
Student to self evaluate using a checklist Parents to use the paper on weekend to find the same information with the student |
Student self evaluates using a daily
checklist to record progress
The teacher will assess the student at the end of October using a performance assessment: Given the Free Press newspaper the student will identify with a marker the following info:
The teacher will assess the student at the end of January using a performance assessment: Given the Free Press/Winnipeg Sun newspapers the student will identify with a marker the following info:
Peers fill out checklist related to locating and reading the information in the newspaper accurately with the scripted questions Teacher will give a performance assessment in June through the interview process using scripted questions by giving the Free Press/Winnipeg Sun to the student and asking her to locate and read the following information:
|
Academic Domain:
Student Specific Outcomes:
Caitlin will read to locate information in 2 daily newspapers within the
Senior 1 ELA class with 95% accuracy by June. (ELA SY1: 3.2.5).
| Performance Objectives | Instructional Strategies | Materials/ Resources |
Roles/ Responsibilities |
Date Started | Date Completed |
| By the end of March, Caitlin will be able to read the information located in the daily newspaper to answer scripted questions posed by peers | Link to natural events through scripted questions that peers ask Caitlin e.g. What is the School Day Cycle today? She answers by locating and reading the information in the paper |
Academic Domain:
Student Specific Outcomes:
By June, within the structure of the Math classroom, the student will
use a calculator to determine the total cost of 3 identified items of
groceries from a flyer with 90% accuracy.
| Performance Objectives |
Instructional Strategies |
Materials/ Resources |
Roles/ Responsibilities |
Date Started | Date Completed | Evaluation and Review |
By October, Caitlin will be able to:
By February, Caitlin will be able to:
|
Provide teacher made grocery cards with the picture
and words printed on the cards for the child to match with the flyer
if word is unknown
Provide opportunity to practice using the flyer and inputting a single item into the calculator Start with items the student is familiar with Model self correcting procedures for the calculator Read the numbers Say the numbers to yourself Input the numbers Check to see if each number is correct |
Teacher made grocery cards Recent flyers from local
stores
Teacher made student self-assessment sheets for indicating accuracy of inputting numbers |
Teacher to supply: flyers, grocery cards, identified
item(s)
To provide student with feedback after each question To develop and record assessment tools: e.g. self assessment checklist for student Student to do self assessment checklist for accuracy To use the visual prompt if necessary |
Pre-survey of grocery items student knows and will
need grocery cards for initial assistance
Self-assessment checklist for student to self-evaluate the accuracy of he inputting Teachers random 3 times per period observation to see if student is inputting single item correctly Teacher made test to determine the mastery of this skill before continuing onto 2 item inputting Weekly, teacher/ Student interview and performance task to determine mastery of adding two items for the total cost |
Social Domain:
Student Specific Outcomes:
By June, within the structure of the Math classroom, the student will
use a calculator to determine the total cost of 3 identified items of
groceries from a flyer with 90% accuracy.
| Performance Objectives | Instructional Strategies | Materials/ Resources |
Roles/ Responsibilities |
Date Started |
Date Completed |
Evaluation and Review |
By June, Caitlin will be able to:
|
When student is doing 2/3 item adding, teacher needs
to model, give time to practice and re-teach and observe process
to ensure student has all the steps
Make a chart as a visual prompt |
Weekly, teacher/
Student interview and performance task to determine mastery of adding three items for the total cost |
Social Domain:
Student Specific Outcomes:
By the end of June, Caitlin will initiate asking a peer to work with her
in a partner activity during any subject area class in 8 out of 10 opportunities
over 10 consecutive days.
| Performance Objectives | Instructional Strategies |
Materials/ Resources |
Roles/ Responsibilities |
Date Started | Date Completed | Evaluation and Review |
| By November, with direct adult prompting, Caitlin
will ask a peer to work with her in a teacher identified partner
activity using scripted language on 4/5 opportunities in 5-day period
By January, Caitlin will ask a peer using scripted language with minimal adult prompting when given an activity that needs a partner By March Caitlin will ask a peer using scripted language without adult prompting when an activity for partners is assigned By June, Caitlin will initiate the asking of a peer to work with her in an activity that needs partners in 8 out of 10 opportunities over 10 consecutive days |
Model and role play
Practice and rehearsal with peers she is comfortable with Use some scripted language written on cue cards to reduce anxiety and provide a repetitive framework Identify an activity that needs a partner with a visual and verbal prompt Use consistent language when prompting Fade prompts |
Scripted language written on cards
Teacher made checklists Student self-assessment checklist |
All subject teachers to:
Resource or homeroom teacher to:
Peers to wait for her to finish before answering Student to use the scripted language when needed To record/chart progress in a journal |
Subject area teachers will record on a master checklist the opportunity for a partner activity and how much prompting was required and if scripted language was used |
Examples of Modifications to Daily Plan
Modifications to Daily Plan for Caitlin September to October
| Class/Student Timetable |
Instructional Strategies |
Assessment Evaluation |
Resources | |
| Materials | Physical | |||
| 8:45 Entry and to homeroom
Domain: Motor |
Adaptations for visual perceptual needs:
|
Daily self evaluation checklist:
By subject teacher filling out checklist
Eliminate the checklist when student is 100% accurate and date on the daily plan sheet |
|
|
| 9:00 ELA
Domain: motor |
Producing the computer generated table
|
Student will self evaluate by filling
out a rating scale related to assistance needed
Student will print the completed, 7 column 2 row, table to keep in ELA binder |
computer with corresponding software
prompt chart |
|
| 9:30 ELA
Domain: Academic |
Read to locate 6 pieces of information
in the Free Press
|
Student self evaluates using a daily
checklist
Teacher does performance assessment |
Free Press Newspaper
Highlighters Markers or chart with legend |
|
Modifications to Daily Plan for Caitlin September to October
| Class/Student Timetable |
Instructional Strategies |
Assessment Evaluation |
Resources | |
Materials |
Physical |
|||
| 10:00 Math Academic Domain | Find the cost of a single identified
item in the flyer and then input the cost into the calculator
List steps needed for inputting on the calculator for one item inputting Teach to self-correct Model examples using the calculator and flyers |
Teacher will complete pre-survey of
knowledge about flyers and grocery cards
Teacher will observe student doing single item randomly 3 times per lesson Teacher made performance test to indicate mastery:
Self Assessment checklist for accuracy of inputting |
Flyers
Grocery cards Calculator |
Maybe a field trip to local grocery store with the resource teacher to connect flyer with prices on shelf |
| 10:30 Locker Break
Motor Domain |
See above information re: books and key for locker | |||
| 10:40 Gym
Social Domain |
Using scripted language and teacher
prompting Caitlin will ask a peer to participate in badminton
Teacher models the approach with a peer while Caitlin watches Teacher prompts Caitlin to ask the identified student using the scripted cards |
Record on master checklist results of activity | Badminton equipment Scripted language cards | |