|
WHAT THE RESEARCH TELLS US
Current education research served as the foundation upon which the K–S4 Agenda
was developed. We learned from the literature that school improvement efforts
do contribute to advancing student success. Learner outcomes improve through
the training and talent of teachers, what goes on in the classrooms and the
overall culture and atmosphere of schools. Academic skills, assignments, experience
and professional development are significant dimensions for teachers. In the
classroom, course content, pedagogy, technology and class size and composition
make a difference. School leadership, goals, professional community, discipline
and the learning environment are school-wide factors that influence student
success.
Every child has the capacity to succeed in school and life. Research shows
that certain school characteristics promote success regardless of student
backgrounds.1 Successful schools are student-centred,
academically rich, have a positive school climate, foster collegial interaction
and have extensive staff development. These schools demonstrate shared leadership
and foster creative problem-solving involving parents and the community.2
- Advancing Student Success
Research emphasizes that the single largest factor affecting academic growth
of student populations is the effectiveness of individual classroom teachers.
Lower-achieving students are the first to benefit as teacher effectiveness
improves.3 Less successful learners benefit
from additional supporting factors such as time spent on learning, opportunities
to meet learning goals and quality of teaching.4
Improving learner outcomes for these students requires a clearer understanding
of the meaning of student success and the active development of change processes
to have a positive impact on student achievement. Changes in instructional
practice and in the culture of teaching involve stronger collaborative relationships
among students, teachers and other partners.5
Classroom practices to improve outcomes include differentiated learning,
linking prior knowledge to new learning, collaboration to encourage students
to work together and the advancement of authentic assessment practices.
Focusing on higher order thinking skills benefits not only advanced students
but also those in need of more basic skills.
Student success is also linked to the support and involvement of the broader
community. Research, professional judgement and practical experience all
show that fostering family and community involvement in schools contributes
to healthy development in children, youth and a better quality of neighbourhood
life for all community members.6
| 1 |
Levin, B. (1995). Poverty and education. Education Canada.
35(2), 28-35. |
| 2 |
Levine, D. U. & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually
effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison,
WI: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED330032). |
| 3 |
Stoll, L. & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools:
Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Philadelphia, PA:
Open University Press. |
| 4 |
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint
for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| 5 |
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth
of educational reform. London: Falmer Press. |
| 6 |
Maeroff, G. I. (1998). Altered destinies: Making life
better for schoolchildren in need. New York: St. Martin's Press. |
Back to top
- Schools, Families and Communities
When schools are able to foster a sense of community, promote ways to advance
equity and voice and increase participation through their partnerships,
students benefit.7 Teachers are often more
willing to work with others when that involvement increases the flow of
resources to schools and classrooms. Community partners make practical contributions
with minimum cost to the schools by bringing in services and support. Creating
family centres in unused space or providing a consistent source of trained
volunteers are two examples. Effective school communities have the capacity
to produce multiple positive effects on students and families.8
What parents do in the home to support and improve their child's development
in school is critical to student success. Improved communication between
home and school, homework support and the development of common approaches
to conflict resolution are examples.9 Schools
too, have assets that can benefit families and communities such as sharing
facilities, materials, equipment, purchasing power, employment opportunities,
and programs. Partners in education should view their partnerships as "two
way streets" with schools giving to their communities, as well as receiving
support.
Research into school quality shows that some schools do better than others
at helping students to learn because they have found ways to engage parents
and others in community development through capacity building.10
There is convincing evidence that community schools are important vehicles
for school improvement.11 They provide
opportunities for communities to work together at the local school level
to address barriers to student success. Community schools can affect not
only educational outcomes but other outcomes as well, such as improved social
behaviour and healthy youth development, better family functioning and parental
involvement, access to support services, enhanced school climate, family
and neighbourhood life.12
| 7 |
Oakes, J. & Lipton, M. (1990). Making the best of
schools: A handbook for parents, teachers and policymakers. New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press. |
| 8 |
Dryfoos, J.G. (2000, June). Evaluation of community
schools: Findings to date. Retrieved April 15, 2002 from http://www.communityschools.org/evaluation/evalcontents.html |
| 9 |
Epstein, J. (1995). School/family/community partnerships:
Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701-712. |
| 10 |
Kretzmann, J. P. & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building
communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's
assets. Chicago: ACTA Publications. |
| 11 |
Sergiovanni, T. (1994). Building community in schools.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| 12 |
Blank, M. J., Bruner, C., Chang, H. & Potapchuk, W.
(1996). Coordinating federal technical assistance to comprehensive community
initiatives: A report on the 'Together We Can' initiative. Washington,
DC: Institute for Educational Leadership. |
Back to top
- School Planning
More is accomplished when schools, families and communities plan together
to build effective school communities. There is growing interest on the
part of many people for an expanded role in shaping the institutions that
affect their lives. School planning and reporting should include school
staff, parents, community members and students in structured decision-making
processes.13 Strengthening planning and
reporting requires schools and divisions to set priorities, measure progress
and use results to improve education for students. The key to effective
planning is the linkage and alignment of school plans with school division
and provincial level planning.
An important trend in public education is an increasing requirement for
consultation and collaboration with the expectation that such approaches
will foster capacity at the local school level. It is important for schools
and divisions to gather and use data to plan appropriately and involve the
broader community in discussions about student success and school improvement.14
There is a need to rethink research methodology, data collection and evaluation
strategies to ensure a good fit between the thinking behind school planning
and the ability to put these ideas into practice. Using results to plan
improvements is an essential element in the development of successful schools.
Research points to the distinction between school effectiveness that is
based largely on results in achievement tests and school success that includes
broader goals and processes.15 Student
achievement is an important component of a good school but every school
is unique and planning should reflect the individual needs of those who
spend so much of their time there.16 School
planning builds a sense of common purpose among school staff, parents, students
and community engaging in processes intended to change school practices
to improve student outcomes.17 Students
succeed when educators and parents build stronger relationships with one
another creating more opportunities for students to develop competence and
more settings in which learners flourish.18
| 13 |
Levin, B. R. & Riffel, J. A. (1997). Schools and
the changing world: Struggling toward the future. London: Falmer Press. |
| 14 |
Lewington, J. & Orpwood, G. (1993). Overdue assignment:
Taking responsibility for Canada's schools. Toronto, ON: Wiley. |
| 15 |
Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to
the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| 16 |
King, A. J. C. & Peart, M. J. (1990). The good school:
Strategies for making secondary schools effective. Toronto, ON: Ontario
Secondary School Teachers' Federation. |
| 17 |
Earl, L. & Lee, L. (1998). Evaluation of the Manitoba
School Improvement Program. Winnipeg, MB: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation. |
| 18 |
Comer, J. P., Haynes, N. M., Joyner, E. T. & Ben-Avie,
M. (1996). Rallying the whole village: The Comer process of reforming education.
New York: Teachers College Press. |
Back to top
- Professional Development
Students learn more from teachers who have strong academic skills and classroom
teaching experience, are teaching in the field in which they are trained,
and who participate in high quality professional development programs.19
Professional development can be built into school planning with learning
focused on the development of team building, conflict management and collaborative
planning skills. Teachers should be able to learn about instructional and
assessment methods that directly relate to student achievement. Improved
student learning for all or most students requires improving teacher learning
for all or most teachers.20
There has been a fundamental shift in what children learn and how they
are taught.21 Teachers have to be prepared
to implement classroom practices that focus not only on content but also
on skills, strategies and opportunities for active learning. Professional
development should provide a theoretical understanding of new concepts through
demonstrations and opportunities for practice with teachers working in teams
for sharing, observation and peer coaching. It is important that teacher
learning opportunities be research-based and supplement teachers' existing
strategies, not replace them.22
There is a need to transform teaching approaches and to place more emphasis
on student understanding and applicability of knowledge. Without appropriate
training, some teachers continue to use a model of teaching that emphasizes
memorizing facts in the absence of a deeper understanding of subject knowledge.23
Teachers need opportunities to learn more about the subjects they teach
and how students learn those subjects. Professional development resources
aimed at gearing these learning opportunities for teachers should focus
on what students are learning and what is being assessed.24
Schools that foster ongoing teacher learning are better places for students
to learn. Indeed, the school as a community of learners provides a context
for everyone's lifelong growth.25
| 19 |
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Professional development schools:
Schools for developing a profession. New York: Teachers College Press.
|
| 20 |
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths
of educational reform. London: Falmer Press. |
| 21 |
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children
think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books. |
| 22 |
Elmore, R. F., Peterson, P. L., & McCarthey, S. J.
(1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school
organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| 23 |
Kohn, A. (1998). What to look for in a classroom and
other essays. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| 24 |
Stoll, L. & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools:
Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Philadelphia: Open
University Press. |
| 25 |
Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within:
Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass. |
Back to top
- Learner Transitions
How students perform academically is key to successful transitions from
early, middle and secondary years into post-secondary education and work.26
There is significant evidence that secondary schools can do more to help
students with these transitions.27
Early school leaving and completion of compulsory education without the
acquisition of skills needed for employment are poor educational outcomes.
Successful transitions require school commitment, with the support and involvement
of their community, to develop shared vision, goals and strategies to support
learner success. Academic preparation, opportunities for career exploration
and work experience all contribute to successful transitions.
It is important to monitor the extent to which students have access to
educational pathways and how they progress through different levels of education.
We know that the higher the family income of high school graduates, the
more likely they are to enrol in post-secondary education but there are
many other factors besides lack of financial resources that affect successful
transitions. The percentage of high school completers who enrol in post-secondary
education in the fall immediately after high school is influenced by the
accessibility of higher education and the value the high school completer
places on post-secondary education compared with other pursuits.28
Students whose parents discuss schools and colleges are more likely to enrol
in post-secondary programs. High school graduates with lower skill levels
are less likely to enrol in post-secondary programs.
Effective programs for preventing failure begin early and continue throughout
the early, middle and senior years. Building on students' personal and cultural
assets contributes to student success at key development points. Varied
approaches such as dual credits, work education, apprenticeship programs
and employability portfolios can support entry to work or post-secondary
education. Successful transitions reflect other important factors such as
the efforts students put into their learning, the choices they make as they
proceed through the system and the quality of the institutions they attend.
| 26 |
Sizer, T. R. (1992). Horace's school: Redesigning the
American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. |
| 27 |
Charner, I., Fraser, B. S., Hubbard, S., Rogers, A. &
Horne, R. (1995). Reforms of the school to work transition: Findings, implications
and challenges. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1), 58-60. |
| 28 |
Human Resources Development Canada. (2002, June). Knowledge
matters: Skills and learning for Canadians. Retrieved July 15, 2002 from
http://www.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/sp-ps/sl-ca/doc/report.shtml |
Back to top
- Education Research
Research is a vehicle for understanding education issues and also for developing
viable strategies to address them. Educational research examines schools
and schooling in terms of relationships, teacher interaction with students,
leadership, processes, allocation and use of resources and organizational
arrangements to find out what affects students learning and in what ways.
Research into these practical issues is helpful in identifying which of
the many options are related to successful outcomes.
Educational research recognizes that measures of student success and school
effectiveness extend beyond high test scores. Learner success has much more
to do with gaining a real understanding of ideas and a developing a keen
interest in learning. Concern for these outcomes suggests that there is
a need to be clear about what is meant by "effective" and whether
or not the effects are short or long term, low or high level.29
Successful school improvement requires a results-oriented process. The
foundation for results involves meaningful teamwork, clear measurable outcomes,
and the continuous collection and analysis of data.30
A great deal of information available at the local school and division levels,
from assessment results to attendance data, can be linked to school improvement
efforts. Monitoring and interpreting this data is important in tracking
the effects of change efforts. To do this requires time for teachers to
work and reflect together. When schools focus on the implications of available
data, they may find evidence that challenges existing perceptions of success
or find discrepancies that raise questions about what is happening and why.
A challenge for schools is how to use data and evidence to determine value-added
measures that will demonstrate increased student achievement and school
improvement outcomes.31 A further challenge
is how to involve the whole school community in efforts to link research
to practice giving administrators, teachers, parents, students and community
members an opportunity for shared inquiry.32
Much is learned from research on effective practice. It is important that
schools are aware of, and use relevant research and evidence in their efforts
to build effective school communities.
| 29 |
Kohn, A. (1998). What to look for in the classroom:
And other essays. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| 30 |
Schmoker, M. (1996). Results: The key to continuous
school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development. |
| 31 |
Pipho, C. (1998). The value-added side of standards.
Phi Delta Kappan, 79(5), 341-342. |
| 32 |
Elmore, R. F., Peterson, P. L. & McCarthey, S. J. (1996).
Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning and school organization.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
Back to top
< Previous | TOC
| Next >
|